[Long Term] found my lowest effective dose by going down, not up
found my lowest effective dose by going down, not up — a position I have arrived at slowly and would like tested.
Appetite returning before the scale moves follows from the mechanism: the appetite effect is the proximal one and weight is the lagging integrated outcome.
Been at maintenance for 3 months on 2.4mg. Nothing happens. That is the whole report and it took me a while to accept it as success.
Withdrawal studies in this class consistently show substantial regain after discontinuation. That is a pharmacological finding about a chronic condition, not a statement about anyone’s discipline.
Happy to answer the boring questions. Those are usually the ones worth asking.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Standing reminder that regain after stopping is a documented pharmacological outcome, and posts framing it as a moral failure get edited.
Maintenance is the phase with the least published guidance and the most individual variation, which is precisely why board consensus here is worth less than usual.
Correction: that trial measured regain after withdrawal, not failure of the drug during treatment. Very different claim.
maintenance is where the logistics finally get boring, which is the point
Interval stretching changes the exposure profile: with a week-long half-life, moving to ten or twelve days lowers trough concentration more than it lowers average exposure. That is why appetite return is often the first thing noticed.
Dose reduction and interval extension are different interventions. Halving the dose keeps the rhythm and lowers the level; stretching keeps the level and lowers the frequency, with a lower trough.
What is the plan if the drift continues for another month?
monthly weigh-ins are enough at this stage
the goal weight you picked at week 1 was a guess
Chased the last three kilos with a dose increase and got a fortnight of constipation and no change in the number.
Small fix — you have described interval stretching and called it a dose reduction. The exposure profiles differ.
seven days to ten to twelve is the sequence people here describe
That is a range, not a trend. Two weigh-ins 18 days apart cannot distinguish them.
maintenance is a phase, not a finish line
a few kilos of drift is not a relapse
the trials that looked at withdrawal are unambiguous about what follows
Two years at maintenance. The logistics are the only remaining work — ordering, storing, remembering.
None of this is a taper plan. What dose holds for you is a question for somebody with your history in front of them.
That reads like a taper schedule and this board cannot hand those out.
I would not treat a two-kilo range as drift requiring action. That is ordinary weight variation.
The habits from the losing phase are what carry it now. That is not inspirational, it is just what happened.
the habits are the part that has to outlive the dose
- 1Maintenance is the phase with the least published guidance and the most…7 comments in this branch · started by u/elise_ramos