Posting this because it is the worst result in my log and hiding it would be pointless. Field Value Vendor not naming yet — see below Product semaglutide 10mg Service…
Lab Results
c/labresults · created 2 Oct 2023
Third-party test results on real orders. Vendor, batch, service, number.
Hot
Template, as required. Field Value Vendor SSA Product Tirzepatide 10mg Batch SSA-2606 Service Janoshik Method RP-HPLC, UV 214nm Claimed 99.0% Result 99.1% Third SSA…
This is the experiment I have wanted to run for about a year and nobody had bothered. Stock Batch Service Claimed Result EU warehouse GY-2604W Janoshik 98.0% 98.3%…
Template first, editorial after. Field Value Vendor ERP Product Tirzepatide 15mg Batch ERP-2606 Service PeptideMeter Claimed 98.0% Result 98.4% The number is…
Sigma-Aldrich — certified reference materials
Reference standards, analytical reagents and system-suitability material. If you are running your own method, start with a known.
Reference standardsPulling six results into one place because they keep getting quoted individually by whichever side of the argument is winning. Date Compound Service Result 2026-02 sema…
Title says it — WWB sema 10mg — 98.6%, batch and method inside — so here is the boring supporting detail that makes it worth anything. 10mg and 98.6%. Those are…
Filing this under things worth writing down: 61.2% on a vial that shipped with a 99% COA. Figures up front so nobody has to dig: 61.2% and 99%. Date of analysis anchors…
split one vial across two services, results within 0.9%. One vial, one service, one member paying, which is the only kind of result this board should treat as evidence.…
Short version of the title, which is already short: QSC tirz — 97.1%, second sample from the same batch. Longer version underneath. Pulling the figures out of the…
JEEP reta 10mg — 98.9%, and yes i paid for it myself. That is the headline. The document, the batch and the service are below so you can argue with the method rather…
my running table: 34 tests, 11 vendors, three years, and before anyone asks: same batch throughout, single submission, no cherry-picking between services. Inter-lab…
Short version of the title, which is already short: 88% is not "basically fine" and i am tired of that reply. Longer version underneath. Figures up front so nobody has…
GL Biochem raw material vs a reseller vial of the same compound. One vial, one service, one member paying, which is the only kind of result this board should treat as…
Something I keep coming back to: we need a standard template or these posts are unsearchable. Kept every report as a PDF with the batch in the filename. Two years in,…
Posting this because the title is the whole finding — SWB sema — 98.2%, cold chain intact, 9 days transit — and a number without its method is a rumour. The numbers the…
Janoshik Analytical — independent HPLC & mass spec
Send the vial, get the number. Third-party purity and identity testing, results published to you regardless of what they say.
Test a vialSponsoredGL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — the synthesis house
Est. 1998. ISO 9001 and cGMP, 1,500+ staff, 200+ patents. There is a fair chance the vial you are about to send for testing started here. Batch-specific COA as standard.
glbiochem.netThe claim in the title is exactly the claim I am making: ERP tirz 15mg — 98.4% and a very clean trace. Nothing implied beyond it. To save the first four comments: 15mg…
Right: four vendors, same compound, same week, one test each. I paid for this one myself, nobody sent me anything, and the receipts are in the comments. QSC BPC, batch…
94.1% with a 1.8% single impurity. is that the des-amido. That is the headline. The document, the batch and the service are below so you can argue with the method…
Title says it — FGP cagrilintide — first independent number i have seen for it — so here is the boring supporting detail that makes it worth anything. GL Biochem BPC,…
Housekeeping: proposal — a flair for PeptideMeter posts. How to build a series that means something, if you are going to spend money on testing anyway. Three tests on…
split one vial across Medutest and Janoshik — 97.6% and 95.1%. That is the headline. The document, the batch and the service are below so you can argue with the method…
Short public-service post: below spec is not what most of this community thinks it is. Sent a vial in specifically to check a supplier’s claim after a good experience.…
the below spec thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down. Making the case below, and I expect to lose some of it in the comments. Kept every report as a…
why does nobody talk about below spec. I would rather ask a basic question now than get this wrong quietly for two months. WXT BPC, batch matched the paperwork,…
three years of Janoshik threads, summarised so you do not have to read them — a position I have arrived at slowly and would like tested. Tested three lots over a year…