GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
129
c/meta·posted 1 year ago by u/noor_cardoso

how much of what we believe about ranking actually comes from disclosure threads

Appeal

The title is the whole question — how much of what we believe about ranking actually comes from disclosure threads — but here is why I am asking.

A rule-change proposal needs replacement wording because that is what can be evaluated. Without it there is nothing to compare against the current text.

Moderation of individual cases happens in modmail rather than in threads, because a public discussion of one person’s removal is worse for that person than a private one.

Submissions older than a year are archived: readable, linkable, and closed to new comments. That keeps a three-year-old thread from being reopened with a reply nobody will see in context.

Corrections welcome, especially the pedantic ones. Pedantry is how this board earns its reputation.

186 up / 57 down76% upvoted15 commentsid 19gqkm22 Jun 2025

15 comments

13 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/draw_up_dizzy24 points·1 year ago

the ranking formula is published, go and read it

replysharereportpermalink
u/noor_cardosoOP11 points·1 year ago

evidence rules are strict here on purpose

replysharereportpermalink
u/arto_fonseca4 points·1 year ago

That is a complaint rather than a proposal. Bring wording and it can actually be discussed.

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_petrescu20 points·1 year ago

Careful — that would make individual moderation cases public by default, which is worse for the person complaining.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hub_opsMOD13 points·1 year ago

Adopted with an amendment, announced with the reasoning. Thank you for writing actual text.

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_ivaturi15 points·1 year ago

Feed position is a function of early votes and time. That structurally favours agreeable early answers over correct late ones, which is why sorting by controversial occasionally is worth the effort.

replysharereportpermalink
u/wanjiru_osei10 points·1 year ago

the archive-after-a-year policy is deliberate

replysharereportpermalink
u/marit_mwangi11 points·1 year ago

Yes. Nobody here is paid and the disclosure page says so in tedious detail, which is the correct level of tedious.

replysharereportpermalink
u/viktor_laurent4 points·1 year ago

sponsor disclosure is on the about page in full

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_varga3 points·1 year ago

Disagree with loosening that. The evidence rule is why a supplier report here means something.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_ndiaye5 points·1 year ago

Small fix — archiving happens at a year, not at six months. It is in the published policy.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yannick_petrov1 point·1 year ago·edited

sponsor disclosure is on the about page in full

Agreed — concrete wording or it is not a proposal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yusuf_achebe1 point·1 year ago

modmail first, always, and the thread second

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.