c/meta wiki
Everything you would otherwise have to learn by getting a post removed. The site talking about itself. Rules, moderation, ranking, wiki.
wiki page · last revised 16 Jul 2026 · maintained by community volunteers
On this page
What this community is for
Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.
c/meta was created on 2 Aug 2023 and currently has 23,400 members and 62 captured submissions. It sits in the quieter, more specialised tier of the site, which mostly affects how fast a question gets answered rather than how well.
The one-line version
The site talking about itself. Rules, moderation, ranking, wiki.
Rules, and why each exists
Community rules come first, then the six site-wide rules that apply everywhere on GLP Research Hub. Community rules are enforced by the moderators listed at the bottom of this page; site rules are enforced by everyone.
- Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
- Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
- Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
And the site rules, which are short on purpose:
- Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
- Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
- Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
- No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
- No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
- Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Terms you will see
Vocabulary that turns up constantly in c/meta. Each links to the topic page, which collects every submission that touches it.
- meta — the site talking about itself: rules, moderation, ranking, wiki.
- rules — discussed frequently in this community — see the topic page for every submission that touches it.
- moderation — volunteers removing things, publicly and with reasons.
- ranking — the documented formulas that order the front page.
- wiki — discussed frequently in this community — see the topic page for every submission that touches it.
- disclosure — discussed frequently in this community — see the topic page for every submission that touches it.
Start here
The twelve highest-scoring submissions in this community. Not necessarily the most correct — the most agreed-with, which is a different thing, and worth remembering when you read them.
- [Meta] proposal — a flair for moderation posts — 2.4k points, 63 comments, 1 year ago
- unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about moderation is guesswork — 2.3k points, 10 comments, 2 years ago
- why does nobody talk about wiki — 2.1k points, 33 comments, 1 year ago
- how much of what we believe about moderation actually comes from wiki threads — 2k points, 35 comments, 1 year ago
- [Discussion] the rules advice in here is 2 years out of date — 2k points, 33 comments, 2 years ago
- [Discussion] can we stop arguing about ranking until somebody posts a number — 1.9k points, 60 comments, 1 year ago
- [Discussion] can we stop arguing about rules until somebody posts a number — 1.9k points, 17 comments, 2 years ago
- three years of ranking threads, summarised so you do not have to read them — 1.7k points, 38 comments, 9 months ago
- reading meta threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly — 1.6k points, 26 comments, 2 years ago
- the wiki thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down — 1.5k points, 51 comments, 8 months ago
- help me understand meta, I have read the wiki twice — 1.5k points, 28 comments, 8 months ago
- unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about ranking is guesswork — 1.4k points, 53 comments, 6 months ago
Asked constantly
- [Question] meta — what am I missing here
- [Question] how do you actually verify disclosure
- [Question] how do you actually verify moderation
- [Question] how do you actually verify wiki
- [Question] how do you actually verify rules
If your question is on that list, read the answers there first. If it is not, ask it — that is what the community is for, and "this has been asked" is only a helpful reply when it comes with a link.
Who runs this
Moderation here is done by volunteers who also post as normal members. They are not clinicians, not vendors, and not paid.
- u/hub_ops — Site operations. I keep the lights on and the sitemap honest. Not a clinician, not a vendor.
- u/mod_ambulatory — Volunteer admin. Ex-ambulance, current spreadsheet enjoyer. I read every report queue item.
- u/rulebook_rachael — Wrote most of the community rules you are about to break. Sorry in advance.
- u/quiet_moderator — I remove the obvious stuff so you never see it. Message the modmail, not me.
Wiki pages are community-maintained summaries, not clinical guidance. If a wiki page and your clinician disagree, your clinician wins.