GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of how much of what we believe about ranking actually comes from disclosure threads — 15 comments in the full submission. View in context.
129
c/meta·submitted 1 year ago by u/noor_cardoso

how much of what we believe about ranking actually comes from disclosure threads

Appealbranch of 6 comments

The title is the whole question — how much of what we believe about ranking actually comes from disclosure threads — but here is why I am asking. A rule-change proposal needs replacement wording because that is what can be evaluated. Without it there is nothing to compare against the current text. Moderation of…

Read the full submission and all 15 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 year ago
u/marit_mwangi11 points·1 year ago

Yes. Nobody here is paid and the disclosure page says so in tedious detail, which is the correct level of tedious.

replysharereportpermalink
u/viktor_laurent4 points·1 year ago

sponsor disclosure is on the about page in full

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_varga3 points·1 year ago

Disagree with loosening that. The evidence rule is why a supplier report here means something.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_ndiaye5 points·1 year ago

Small fix — archiving happens at a year, not at six months. It is in the published policy.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yannick_petrov1 point·1 year ago·edited

sponsor disclosure is on the about page in full

Agreed — concrete wording or it is not a proposal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yusuf_achebe1 point·1 year ago

modmail first, always, and the thread second

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →