GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
3.1k
c/maintenancephase·posted 12 months ago by u/cesar_oyelaran

is it normal to get early fullness at week 90

Results Well Actually ×9 Long Haul ×1 Receipts ×1

is it normal to get early fullness at week 90, logged the same way every week so the comparison is at least internally fair.

Body weight varies by a couple of kilos over days in stable people through fluid, glycogen and gut content. A range is not a trend.

Withdrawal studies in this class consistently show substantial regain after discontinuation. That is a pharmacological finding about a chronic condition, not a statement about anyone’s discipline.

Would rather be corrected in public than confident in private.

3,500 up / 426 down89% upvoted43 commentsid rtuq101 Aug 2025

43 comments

30 in this archive, depth 6

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/karim_hartmann352 points·12 months ago

Maintenance is the phase with the least published guidance and the most individual variation, which is precisely why board consensus here is worth less than usual.

replysharereportpermalink
u/adnan_sandvik-26 points·12 months ago

Been at maintenance for 5 months on 0.5mg. Nothing happens. That is the whole report and it took me a while to accept it as success.

replysharereportpermalink
u/throwaway_91821 point·12 months ago

the lowest effective dose is a real target and nobody talks about it

replysharereportpermalink
u/noor_vermeulen1 point·12 months ago

the trials that looked at withdrawal are unambiguous about what follows

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_vermeulen1 point·12 months ago

maintenance is a phase, not a finish line

replysharereportpermalink
u/hugo_norgaard1 point·11 months ago

a few kilos of drift is not a relapse

replysharereportpermalink
u/cesar_oyelaranOP1 point·11 months ago

What does your weigh-in frequency look like at this point?

replysharereportpermalink
u/brigade_detector1 point·11 months ago

regain after stopping is the expected outcome, not a personal failure

replysharereportpermalink
u/usp_appendixcompendial1 point·12 months ago

Did you decide what maintenance would look like before you got here?

replysharereportpermalink
u/column_dead_volume1 point·12 months ago

do not chase the last two kilos with a dose increase

replysharereportpermalink
u/ewan_marchand1 point·12 months ago

stretching the interval is not the same as reducing the dose

replysharereportpermalink
u/arne_ndiaye1 point·12 months ago

Small fix — you have described interval stretching and called it a dose reduction. The exposure profiles differ.

replysharereportpermalink
u/salma_almeida322 points·12 months ago·edited

Careful — a dose reduction plan is a conversation with someone who knows your history, not a board consensus.

replysharereportpermalink
u/piotr_grimaldi257 points·12 months ago

Drifted up 4kg over a winter and panicked. It came back off without any change, which is apparently just what weight does.

replysharereportpermalink
u/purity_pedantanalytical149 points·12 months ago

How long have you been at goal?

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]110 points·12 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/vitamin_d_void59 points·12 months ago

Correction: that trial measured regain after withdrawal, not failure of the drug during treatment. Very different claim.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_osei53 points·12 months ago

That is a range, not a trend. Two weigh-ins 10 days apart cannot distinguish them.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hedda_ekstrom162 points·12 months ago

None of this is a taper plan. What dose holds for you is a question for somebody with your history in front of them.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_vermeulen106 points·12 months ago

Appetite returning before the scale moves follows from the mechanism: the appetite effect is the proximal one and weight is the lagging integrated outcome.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gradient_goblin57 points·12 months ago

Disagree with chasing the last stretch by going up. You are trading a real side-effect cost for a number you chose arbitrarily.

replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_vestergaard38 points·12 months ago

I would not treat a two-kilo range as drift requiring action. That is ordinary weight variation.

replysharereportpermalink
u/cesar_oyelaranOP16 points·12 months ago

Wrote down what maintenance would look like at about week 35, before I needed it. Having decided in advance made the transition boring.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →
u/graph_it_gary66 points·12 months ago

Chased the last three kilos with a dose increase and got a fortnight of sulphur burps and no change in the number.

replysharereportpermalink
u/brigade_detector22 points·12 months ago

Same. Monthly is plenty at this stage and daily weighing made me miserable for no information gain.

replysharereportpermalink
u/graph_it_gary18 points·12 months ago

maintenance is where the logistics finally get boring, which is the point

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (3) →
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/maintenancephase

The part nobody posts about: what happens at goal weight. Finding a lowest effective dose, dose-interval stretching, regain risk data, muscle retention, the psychology of not having a number to chase, and staying on indefinitely versus tapering.

39kmembers
95submissions
Dec 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/maintenancephase rules
  1. State how long you have been at maintenance. "Maintenance" at week 30 is not maintenance.
  2. Regain is not a moral failing and posts implying it is get removed.
  3. Dose-stretching experiences welcome; dose-stretching instructions are not.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.