week 95 check-in — 48kg down, nausea manageable, one thing confusing me
Here it is: week 95 check-in — 48kg down, nausea manageable, one thing confusing me. One person, one log, no control group, so read it accordingly.
The numbers the title promised, since a headline without them is worthless: week 95 and 48kg. Everything below is context for those.
On stopping, since it is the question underneath most posts here.
Withdrawal studies in this class show substantial regain after discontinuation, consistently, across compounds. Appetite returns first, typically well before the scale moves. That is a statement about the pharmacology of a chronic condition, not about anybody’s character, and the framing matters because people quit in shame over an entirely predictable result.
If you are going to stop — for cost, for supply, for any reason — the useful preparation is deciding in advance what you will watch for and what your plan is when appetite comes back. Doing that in advance is much easier than doing it in a panic, and it is a conversation to have with someone who knows your history.
The two levers, described properly, because this board mixes them up constantly.
Reducing the dose lowers average exposure while keeping the weekly rhythm. Stretching the interval keeps the dose but lowers the trough between injections, which — with a week-long half-life — is why people notice appetite returning towards the end of a stretched cycle before they see anything on the scale.
The reported pattern here is stretching in small steps, a week to ten days to twelve, with appetite as the signal rather than the scale. Some people find dose reduction more comfortable. Neither is a schedule anybody here can hand you, and the fact that this phase has the least published guidance is exactly why board consensus deserves less weight than usual.
Please do not ask me what dose you should be on. I genuinely do not know and neither does anyone else here.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Maintenance is the phase with the least published guidance and the most individual variation, which is precisely why board consensus here is worth less than usual.
Stretching the interval, reducing the dose, or both?
Been at maintenance for 21 months on 10mg. Nothing happens. That is the whole report and it took me a while to accept it as success.
Small fix — you have described interval stretching and called it a dose reduction. The exposure profiles differ.
maintenance is where the logistics finally get boring, which is the point
Maintenance is the phase with the least published guidance and the most individual variation, which is precisely why board consensus here is worth les
Adding one thing — decide what maintenance looks like before you arrive at it.
I would not treat a two-kilo range as drift requiring action. That is ordinary weight variation.
do not chase the last two kilos with a dose increase
What is the plan if the drift continues for another month?
Withdrawal studies in this class consistently show substantial regain after discontinuation. That is a pharmacological finding about a chronic condition, not a statement about anyone’s discipline.
a few kilos of drift is not a relapse
What maintenance actually looks like, from the people on this board who have been in it longest.
You find a dose or an interval that holds the weight with side effects you barely notice, and then you stop optimising. Weigh monthly rather than daily. Expect a couple of kilos of range and do not act on it. Keep the habits that did the work in the losing phase, because they are the part that has to outlive the dose.
The most common mistake described here is treating arrival as a plateau and pushing the dose to chase a number chosen at week one by a person who did not yet know what maintenance felt like.
Stretched from seven to ten days and then to twelve over about four months. Appetite told me where the limit was before the scale did.
the trials that looked at withdrawal are unambiguous about what follows
Is the goal weight still the one you picked at the start?
Appetite returning before the scale moves follows from the mechanism: the appetite effect is the proximal one and weight is the lagging integrated outcome.
the lowest effective dose is a real target and nobody talks about it
The habits from the losing phase are what carry it now. That is not inspirational, it is just what happened.
The habits from the losing phase are what carry it now.
This reframing is the most useful thing on the board for anyone approaching this phase.
the habits are the part that has to outlive the dose
seven days to ten to twelve is the sequence people here describe
Left up. It is a maintenance report with a duration attached and those are rarer than they should be.
That is a range, not a trend. Two weigh-ins 20 days apart cannot distinguish them.
plan the maintenance phase before you need it
What dose are you holding, and for how long now?
Weigh monthly now. Best change I made in the whole run and it cost nothing.
Correction: that trial measured regain after withdrawal, not failure of the drug during treatment. Very different claim.
Drifted up 9kg over a winter and panicked. It came back off without any change, which is apparently just what weight does.
- 1The habits from the losing phase are what carry it now. That is not…11 comments in this branch · started by u/still_here_2026
- 2What maintenance actually looks like, from the people on this board who have…7 comments in this branch · started by u/mod_cold_room