what changed for me between month 9 and month 13
Trying to get a straight answer on this: what changed for me between month 9 and month 13.
Annotation is what makes a log survive contact with your future self. A single note beside an unusual week saves an hour of puzzled reconstruction later.
Attribution requires that one thing change at a time. A log with dose, training and intake all moving in the same fortnight cannot assign anything to any of them.
Missing entries recorded as blanks preserve the shape of the series. Dropping them silently makes the remaining points look more regular than they were.
Corrections welcome, especially the pedantic ones. Pedantry is how this board earns its reputation.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Choose a format you will still be able to open in two years. Plain text or a spreadsheet you export beats an application that may not exist.
[deleted]
Kept one line a week for 4 months. It was pointless for the first eight weeks and then it was the most useful document I owned.
Are the missed weeks in there as blanks or dropped entirely?
Contemporaneous records do not drift; reconstructed ones do, and the drift is systematic rather than random because memory smooths.
That template is elaborate enough that you will stop using it by week ten. Mine was.
Retitled — a log is a record, not a protocol, and the original read as a schedule for others to follow.
Yes — write the concentration in the log as well as on the vial. Belt and braces and it costs nothing.
A log is a record of what you did. It is not a protocol, and posting one as a schedule for other members is a different thing that this board does not do.