GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
2.6k
c/dosinglogs·posted 1 year ago by u/liv_okafor

what would you tell week-1 you about weekly update

Concluded Well Actually ×6 The Quiet One ×1 Receipts ×2

Slightly embarrassed to be asking this, but: what would you tell week-1 you about weekly update.

Annotated the fortnight I changed training. Without that note the numbers around it would look like a mystery.

The attribution problem, which is the reason most logs on this board cannot answer the question their owner is asking.

If dose, training, intake and sleep all changed in the same fortnight, no analysis of the resulting numbers can tell you which one moved the outcome. That is not a limitation of your spreadsheet; it is a limitation of the design.

The fix is unglamorous: change one thing at a time, leave it long enough to see, and annotate the weeks where something else intruded anyway — because life will intrude. A log with honest annotations answers questions. A log with four simultaneous changes and a confident conclusion is the most common thing posted here, and it does not.

Why contemporaneous beats reconstructed, with the failure mode.

Memory smooths. Reconstructing a fortnight from recollection produces a series that is more regular, more consistent with your current beliefs, and quietly wrong in a direction that flatters the story you are already telling.

I found this out by reconstructing six weeks and later finding order receipts that contradicted my own entries. The log was not a little wrong; it was wrong in exactly the direction that made my narrative work. Write it down on the day, even the boring days, especially the boring days.

If somebody has the same thing measured a different way, post it next to mine and we will see whether they agree.

2,700 up / 76 down97% upvoted20 commentsid rc4dk917 Sep 2024

20 comments

8 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/noor_hovland384 points·1 year ago

Missing entries recorded as blanks preserve the shape of the series. Dropping them silently makes the remaining points look more regular than they were.

replysharereportpermalink
u/spreadsheet_gremlinMOD213 points·1 year ago

Left up. Dates, consistent conditions and annotations, which is the standard here.

replysharereportpermalink
u/quarter_dose_queenlow and slow76 points·1 year ago

Left up.

spreadsheet_gremlin is right about blanks. Silent gaps make the series lie.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bastian_ekstrom146 points·1 year ago

Correction: those two entries are 18 weeks apart, not consecutive, which changes how the middle of that series reads.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kofi_ferreira248 points·1 year ago

Exported the whole thing to a plain text file after nearly losing it in an app that shut down.

replysharereportpermalink
u/liv_okaforOP134 points·1 year ago

Is the concentration recorded anywhere in the log?

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]96 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/ahmed_abubakar25 points·1 year ago·edited

Careful — posting a log as a schedule for other people to follow is not what this board is for.

replysharereportpermalink
About c/dosinglogs

Public dosing logs kept over months and years: dose, date, weight, waist, side effects, labs. The value is in the boring consistency, so log posts are updated rather than reposted and the community rewards the people still updating at week 90.

27kmembers
62submissions
May 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/dosinglogs rules
  1. One log per person. Update it; do not repost it.
  2. Include the dose and the date on every update.
  3. Logs that stop for 90 days get the Concluded flair automatically.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.