[Question] how do you actually verify weekly update
how do you actually verify weekly update, and I want the answer with the reasoning attached rather than just the conclusion.
The four columns that survive, after several people here have tried and abandoned much more elaborate systems.
Date. Dose. One number measured under consistent conditions. A short note when anything unusual happened. That is it. Anything more and you will stop, and a log you stop keeping is worth less than a crude one you maintain.
Add a waist measurement monthly if you can be bothered, and a sleep column if you want the one variable that explains the most confusing weeks. Everything else can be reconstructed from those, and nothing can be reconstructed from a log you abandoned in week nine.
Wrote the concentration into the log as well as on the vial. Have referred back to it more than once.
Exported the whole thing to a plain text file after nearly losing it in an app that shut down.
I will update this if the picture changes rather than quietly leaving it up.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Why contemporaneous beats reconstructed, with the failure mode.
Memory smooths. Reconstructing a fortnight from recollection produces a series that is more regular, more consistent with your current beliefs, and quietly wrong in a direction that flatters the story you are already telling.
I found this out by reconstructing six weeks and later finding order receipts that contradicted my own entries. The log was not a little wrong; it was wrong in exactly the direction that made my narrative work. Write it down on the day, even the boring days, especially the boring days.
Added a sleep column late and immediately understood two of my worst weeks.
the value of a log is in month six, not week one
annotate the weeks where something else changed
record the dose, the day and one number, that is enough
Built an elaborate spreadsheet, abandoned it by week nine, restarted with four columns and have kept it ever since.
Left up. Dates, consistent conditions and annotations, which is the standard here.
Attribution requires that one thing change at a time. A log with dose, training and intake all moving in the same fortnight cannot assign anything to any of them.
Right, and the payoff arrives around month six when a pattern becomes visible that nobody could hold in their head.
retrospective logs drift, contemporaneous ones do not
waist monthly, weight weekly, notes whenever
Missing entries recorded as blanks preserve the shape of the series. Dropping them silently makes the remaining points look more regular than they were.
Careful — posting a log as a schedule for other people to follow is not what this board is for.
What is the one column you added late and wish you had from the start?
Agreed that consistent conditions matter more than frequency. Daily weights under varying conditions are noise.
Logged the missed weeks as blanks rather than skipping them. The gaps turned out to be the informative part.
Kept one line a week for 11 months. It was pointless for the first eight weeks and then it was the most useful document I owned.
Yes — write the concentration in the log as well as on the vial. Belt and braces and it costs nothing.
Reconstructed six weeks from memory once and later found receipts that contradicted my own log. Never again.
Reconstructed six weeks from memory once and later found receipts that contradicted my own log.
Agreed — and the payoff genuinely arrives in month six, not week two.
- 1Why contemporaneous beats reconstructed, with the failure mode. Memory…6 comments in this branch · started by u/blunt_coldbox