[Lab] 8th independent test on QST — 98.6% on a claimed 98.5%, and the trend is the interesting part
8th independent test on QST — 98.6% on a claimed 98.5%, and the trend is the interesting part. I will put the method line and the batch identifier up front because that is what makes this checkable. The relevant figures are 98.6% and 98.5%, and they come from the same log I have kept the whole time. It is a dual GIP…
if 7.5 is working, 10 is not automatically better
Held 7.5 for five months. Everyone kept asking when I was going to 10. The answer was never, because 7.5 was working.
Research-use-only material is not approved for human use. Anything in this thread about how a research vial "should" titrate is a discussion about chemistry, not a plan.
I would separate the two claims. That the GIP arm exists is uncontroversial; that it explains your sulphur burps pattern is a guess.
Did you come to this from sema, and if so how long was the gap?
dual agonist, so the GIP arm is doing something the sema threads will not tell you about