GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of am I the only one who found triple agonist harder than the injections — 36 comments in the full submission. View in context.
5k
c/retatrutide·submitted 1 year ago by u/janek_ferrari

am I the only one who found triple agonist harder than the injections

Discussionbranch of 10 comments

Slightly embarrassed to be asking this, but: am I the only one who found triple agonist harder than the injections. Stopped at a low step because there was no reason to go further and no data to tell me what further would do. The standing caveat, written out properly because it keeps getting compressed into a…

Read the full submission and all 36 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 1 year ago
u/nikhil_lindqvist255 points·1 year ago

Right, and it bears repeating that nothing here is approved anywhere and research material is not for human use.

replysharereportpermalink
u/janek_ferrariOP298 points·1 year ago

Right, and it bears repeating that nothing here is approved anywhere and research material is not for human use.

Disagree with this specific inference. A 48-week readout does not tell you the shape of the curve after it.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (8) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/retatrutide

Retatrutide: GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonism, the TRIUMPH programme, and the fact that most people discussing it are handling research-grade material with no human-use approval anywhere. Dose-response, heart-rate signal, and the unusually steep phase-2 weight curves get argued about here weekly.

65kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/retatrutide rules
  1. Retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use. Posts must not read as usage instructions.
  2. Phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers. Cite the trial and the dose arm.
  3. Heart-rate and dose-escalation reports need actual measurements, not impressions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.