GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
8.3k
c/retatrutide·posted 1 year ago by u/nikhil_asante

[Results] 45 weeks on 0.25mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring

Results Cold Box ×1 Well Actually ×2 Receipts ×3

Check-in as promised in the title: 45 weeks on 0.25mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring.

The numbers the title promised, since a headline without them is worthless: 45 weeks and 0.25mg. Everything below is context for those.

Kept a log specifically because there is so little published. It is one person and it is not data.

The thing that surprised me was how much of the discussion here is inference rather than measurement.

I will update this if the picture changes rather than quietly leaving it up.

9,808 up / 1,528 down87% upvoted44 commentsid 1uvxij19 Nov 2024

44 comments

9 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/quiet_moderatormod789 points·1 year ago

Increases in heart rate have been reported across this receptor class. The magnitude and clinical significance are exactly what phase 3 is powered to establish.

replysharereportpermalink
u/andres_restrepo442 points·1 year ago

Went up slowly, deliberately, because everything on this board says the escalation is where trouble lives. Uneventful so far and I am not going to pretend that is a finding.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ewan_marchand531 points·1 year ago

It is a triple agonist at the GLP-1, GIP and glucagon receptors. The glucagon arm is the genuinely novel component and it is the one with the least human outcome data behind it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_agyeman159 points·1 year ago

a lot of the confident posting here is extrapolation

replysharereportpermalink
u/baseline_drifteranalytical180 points·1 year ago

Small fix — three receptors, not two. GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, and the third one is the reason this compound gets its own board.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nikhil_asanteOP115 points·1 year ago

The muscle cramps profile felt different rather than worse. Hard to describe and impossible to quantify, so take it as an impression.

replysharereportpermalink
u/solene_ilunga120 points·1 year ago

It is a triple agonist at the GLP-1, GIP and glucagon receptors.

Disagree with this specific inference. A 48-week readout does not tell you the shape of the curve after it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yannick_barros35 points·1 year ago

Glucagon receptor agonism is associated with increased energy expenditure and with hepatic effects. That is a mechanistic story with strong preclinical support and limited phase 2 human data.

replysharereportpermalink
u/helga_vermeulen24 points·1 year ago

Correction: TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme. The number you are quoting is from the phase 2 readout, which is a different trial.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/retatrutide

Retatrutide: GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonism, the TRIUMPH programme, and the fact that most people discussing it are handling research-grade material with no human-use approval anywhere. Dose-response, heart-rate signal, and the unusually steep phase-2 weight curves get argued about here weekly.

65kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/retatrutide rules
  1. Retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use. Posts must not read as usage instructions.
  2. Phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers. Cite the trial and the dose arm.
  3. Heart-rate and dose-escalation reports need actual measurements, not impressions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.