[Lab] two reta batches, two services, 98.4% and 97.9%
two reta batches, two services, 98.4% and 97.9%, and before anyone asks: same batch throughout, single submission, no cherry-picking between services. 98.4% and 97.9%. Those are measured, not estimated, and not rounded up in my favour. Stopped at a low step because there was no reason to go further and no data to…
Is that the 48-week figure or an earlier readout?
dose escalation in the trials was slow for a reason
What is the source for that figure — the published paper or a summary of it?
That is body weight change, not fat mass. The trials report the first and people quote it as the second.
Has anyone posted an independent test on this compound recently?
Same read. The energy-expenditure mechanism is the interesting bit and it is not established in humans at scale.
Small fix — three receptors, not two. GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, and the third one is the reason this compound gets its own board.
the phase 2 numbers were striking and they were also 48 weeks in a small population