[Trial Data] TRIUMPH timeline — what we actually know vs what gets repeated
TRIUMPH timeline — what we actually know vs what gets repeated. Change my mind, genuinely — I have no stake in being right about this. Nothing containing this compound is approved anywhere. Research-use-only material is not approved for human use, and that is a statement of fact rather than a disclaimer. The phase 2…
Left up. It reads the phase 2 paper carefully and it is honest about the intervals.
Left up.
Disagree with this specific inference. A 48-week readout does not tell you the shape of the curve after it.
Correction: TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme. The number you are quoting is from the phase 2 readout, which is a different trial.
Correction: TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme.
Adding the standing caveat: none of this is approved anywhere and research material is not for human use.
not approved anywhere, which is the single most important fact in this board
Correcting my own comment above: that figure was the 36-week interim, not the 48-week endpoint.
Small fix — three receptors, not two. GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, and the third one is the reason this compound gets its own board.
Not convinced. You are attributing a week of food noise to the glucagon arm when the escalation rate alone would explain it.
research-use-only material is not approved for human use, full stop
Push back: quoting the phase 2 headline as an expected outcome is not a fair reading of a small trial with wide intervals.
triple agonist — GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, and the glucagon arm is the new part