GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Question] how do you actually verify rules — 11 comments in the full submission. View in context.
-66
c/meta·submitted 12 months ago by u/vito_chowdhury

[Question] how do you actually verify rules

Discussionbranch of 6 comments

Slightly embarrassed to be asking this, but: how do you actually verify rules. Checked the sponsor disclosure because I assumed it would be vague. It was extremely specific and slightly boring. Funding and links, in full, because the question deserves a straight answer. Sponsor units are labelled as sponsored. Each…

Read the full submission and all 11 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 12 months ago
u/farid_jansen5 points·12 months ago

Proposed a rule change here with actual wording and it was adopted. That is the process working and it is not fast.

replysharereportpermalink
u/placebo_arm_pam1 point·12 months ago

Right, and the storefront links on source pages are marked and disclosed, which is the honest way to do it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yannick_petrov1 point·12 months ago

Sorted by controversial for a week and found four of the best threads I have read here.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_varga1 point·12 months ago

That is a complaint rather than a proposal. Bring wording and it can actually be discussed.

replysharereportpermalink
u/arto_fonseca1 point·12 months ago

ranked feeds mean the top comment is not the best answer

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_fonseca1 point·12 months ago·edited

evidence rules are strict here on purpose

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.comSponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →