GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of three years of ranking threads, summarised so you do not have to read them — 38 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.7k
c/meta·submitted 9 months ago by u/analog_alphabet

three years of ranking threads, summarised so you do not have to read them

Appealbranch of 8 comments

three years of ranking threads, summarised so you do not have to read them — a position I have arrived at slowly and would like tested. Submissions older than a year are archived: readable, linkable, and closed to new comments. That keeps a three-year-old thread from being reopened with a reply nobody will see in…

Read the full submission and all 38 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 9 months ago
u/rasmus_kuipers45 points·9 months ago

ranked feeds mean the top comment is not the best answer

replysharereportpermalink
u/ice_pack_auditcold chain33 points·9 months ago

That is the controversial ordering, not the hot one. Different formula, different behaviour.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_varga9 points·9 months ago

sponsor disclosure is on the about page in full

replysharereportpermalink
u/arto_fonseca7 points·9 months ago

I would not archive earlier. The old threads are the most-searched thing on the site.

replysharereportpermalink
u/vito_chowdhury5 points·9 months ago

sponsor disclosure is on the about page in full

ismael_varga is right that the strict evidence rule is the asset, not the friction.

replysharereportpermalink
u/analog_alphabetOP23 points·9 months ago

Who does this help, and who does it cost?

replysharereportpermalink
u/wanjiru_osei8 points·9 months ago

the wiki is editable by anybody with standing on the site

replysharereportpermalink
u/tomas_lundgren33 points·9 months ago

the ranking formula is published, go and read it

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →