GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] 18th independent test on GL Biochem — 99.5% on a claimed 99.0%, and the trend is the interesting part — 47 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.3k
c/labresults·submitted 1 year ago by u/clara_weiss

[Lab] 18th independent test on GL Biochem — 99.5% on a claimed 99.0%, and the trend is the interesting part

Labbranch of 6 comments

18th independent test on GL Biochem — 99.5% on a claimed 99.0%, and the trend is the interesting part, and before anyone asks: same batch throughout, single submission, no cherry-picking between services. 99.5% and 99.0%. Those are measured, not estimated, and not rounded up in my favour. Split one vial between…

Read the full submission and all 47 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 year ago
u/tomas_lundgren49 points·1 year ago

Right, and a point or two between services is ordinary. It is agreement, and every month somebody posts it as a scandal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/teodor_jansen33 points·1 year ago

Small fix — same supplier, different lot. The two rows in the log are not the same batch.

replysharereportpermalink
u/elise_ramos14 points·1 year ago

Which service, and did you pay for it yourself?

replysharereportpermalink
u/janoshik_junkieindependent tester27 points·1 year ago

inter-lab variance runs a point or two, plan your outrage accordingly

replysharereportpermalink
u/peptidemeter_pat20 points·1 year ago·edited

inter-lab variance runs a point or two, plan your outrage accordingly

This is why the template has a batch field. Without it the result is about a vial nobody can identify.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bianca_demir6 points·1 year ago

Not convinced by the comparison. Different services, different gradients, and you are treating one as ground truth.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.