GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of small win: hepatic fat stopped being a problem at week 91 — 66 comments in the full submission. View in context.
761
c/survodutide·submitted 9 months ago by u/elin_ferrari

small win: hepatic fat stopped being a problem at week 91

Cautionbranch of 9 comments

Check-in as promised in the title: small win: hepatic fat stopped being a problem at week 91. Nothing containing this compound is approved anywhere. Research-use-only material is not approved for human use. Independent purity results for this compound are very sparse across the whole site, which means any impression…

Read the full submission and all 66 comments →

This branch

9 comments, started 9 months ago
u/farid_kuipers59 points·9 months ago

How fast was the escalation in that protocol?

replysharereportpermalink
u/lyophile_lou29 points·9 months ago

Histological endpoints in this field are scored on biopsy: resolution of steatohepatitis without worsening of fibrosis, or improvement in fibrosis without worsening of steatohepatitis. Both are harder to achieve and to interpret than an imaging surrogate.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nora_oyelaran7 points·9 months ago

the weight numbers are secondary to what this is being developed for

replysharereportpermalink
u/deleted_my_history5 points·9 months ago

dual GLP-1 and glucagon agonist, and the glucagon arm is the story

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_ivaturi5 points·9 months ago

Correction: that is the imaging endpoint, not the histological one. The paper reports both and they differ substantially.

replysharereportpermalink
u/crosspost_bot_no2 points·9 months ago

Agreed that the endpoint definitions matter enormously and almost nobody reads them before quoting a response rate.

replysharereportpermalink
u/julia_mensa22 points·9 months ago

Histological endpoints in this field are scored on biopsy: resolution of steatohepatitis without worsening of fibrosis, or improvement in fibrosis wit

Disagreeing with this bit: that number comes from a different programme with a different population.

replysharereportpermalink
u/farid_kuipers6 points·9 months ago

Are you reading the publication or a summary?

replysharereportpermalink
u/draw_up_dizzy8 points·9 months ago

Yes — nothing containing this is approved anywhere, which is the first fact and usually the last one mentioned.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/survodutide

Survodutide-specific discussion: glucagon-receptor co-agonism, the hepatic fat and MASH resolution data, and how the side-effect profile compares with GIP-based dual agonism. Small community, high signal.

12kmembers
62submissions
Feb 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/survodutide rules
  1. Glucagon co-agonism has a distinct safety story. Do not generalise from tirzepatide.
  2. MASH claims need the trial and the biopsy endpoint.
  3. Not approved. Descriptive posts only.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.