someone explain nausea to me like I have not read a paper in years
Trying to get a straight answer on this: someone explain nausea to me like I have not read a paper in years. On buying things to fix side effects, which I did extensively and would not do again. The interventions that changed anything for me were all behavioural and free: smaller meals, eating slower, stopping food a…
A symptom that begins the day after the shot and fades by day four tracks the exposure curve. One that appears at random in week 80 probably does not, and that is worth saying to a clinician rather than to us.
A symptom that begins the day after the shot and fades by day four tracks the exposure curve.
Agreed, with the caveat that "usually settles" is not "always settles" and the exceptions should still get asked about properly.
The effect on gastric emptying is most pronounced early and attenuates with continued dosing, which is the mechanism behind the "it settles at a stable dose" pattern the whole board reports.
What is intake actually looking like — fibre and water especially?
if it is severe or persistent that is a clinician question, not a board question
fatigue plus low intake is usually just low intake
fatigue plus low intake is usually just low intake
This is the shape almost everybody here describes, and it is the single most reassuring thing in the thread.
fibre and water before you buy anything to fix it
Same pattern here. It settled at a stable dose without me doing anything clever.
Is it every week or did it start at a particular dose?