GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
530
c/semaglutide·posted 1 year ago by u/marit_coelho

[Results] 37 weeks, 6kg, and weekly dosing was the hard part

Results Receipts ×6

37 weeks, 6kg, and weekly dosing was the hard part. Full detail below, and I have tried to keep the editorialising out of it.

Numbers, in the order they matter: 37 weeks and 6kg.

Steady state after a dose change takes four to five half-lives, so the fair judgement point on a new step is about a month, not four days.

The weekly interval comes out of the half-life — roughly a week — so you are on a smooth curve rather than a series of spikes. That is also why moving your day slightly does very little.

If somebody has the same thing measured a different way, post it next to mine and we will see whether they agree.

782 up / 252 down76% upvoted29 commentsid 1cdb9x13 May 2025

29 comments

20 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/hassan_ostergaard77 points·1 year ago

The escalation schedule in the trials existed to keep people on the drug. It is a tolerability ramp, and it is why the label reads the way it does.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bilal_osei62 points·1 year ago

sema is weekly for a reason, the half-life does the smoothing

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_kimani52 points·1 year ago

week 52 plateau is the most predictable thing in this entire board

replysharereportpermalink
u/lane_map_larrylogistics43 points·1 year ago

sema is weekly for a reason, the half-life does the smoothing

bilal_osei is describing the standard shape here and it matches the trial data better than most anecdotes do.

replysharereportpermalink
u/coa_janitormod · c/coa15 points·1 year ago

My stall was eleven weeks. Eleven. Then it moved again without me changing anything at all.

replysharereportpermalink
u/slow_logbook_notes7 points·1 year ago

the ladder exists because the gut needs the time, not because the pharmacy likes paperwork

replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_demir41 points·1 year ago

nausea that arrives on day two and fades by day four is the standard shape

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_weiss33 points·1 year ago·edited

Cosigning. The appetite change and the scale change ran about three weeks apart for me too.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sofia_wikstrom15 points·1 year ago

2.4 is a ceiling, not a target

replysharereportpermalink
u/wanjiru_varga-37 points·1 year ago

stalling at 2.4mg is information, not a verdict

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_weiss24 points·1 year ago

Does fatigue track the day after the shot, or is it there all week?

replysharereportpermalink
u/sorted_by_new6 points·1 year ago

staying at 2.4mg for an extra month is a legitimate plan

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]9 points·1 year ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_weiss11 points·1 year ago

Correct, and worth adding: the trial average is an average. Half the people in it did worse than 15% and were still on the drug.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rania_diallo14 points·1 year ago·edited

This matches me almost exactly, right down to the early fullness showing up on the second day and being gone by the fourth.

replysharereportpermalink
u/prior_auth_painappeals17 points·1 year ago

Weight change and appetite change are different endpoints on different timescales. Conflating them is where most of the confusion on this board starts.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tomas_kimani14 points·1 year ago

the first four weeks are a tolerance check, not a weight-loss phase

replysharereportpermalink
u/ravi_sandvik12 points·1 year ago

the scale is the least sensitive instrument you own

replysharereportpermalink
u/marit_coelhoOP6 points·1 year ago·edited

Correcting myself from earlier in the thread: I said week 6 and it was week 14. Same shape, wrong number.

replysharereportpermalink
u/alcohol_aversion2 points·1 year ago

STEP-1 averaged just under 15% at 68 weeks, so a 10% year is not a failure

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/semaglutide

Everything semaglutide: branded pens, compounded vials, oral formulations and the research-grade material people reconstitute themselves. Titration schedules, side-effect management, plateau troubleshooting and long-term maintenance. Dose questions are welcome; "what dose should I take" answers are not, because nobody here is your prescriber.

215kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/semaglutide rules
  1. No requests for a personal dose recommendation — describe what you did, not what someone else should do.
  2. Results posts need a timeframe and a starting point, or they get removed as unverifiable.
  3. Brand, compounded and research-grade material are all on-topic. Sourcing requests are not — that is c/vendorvetting.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.