GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] are the c/vendorvetting evidence rules too strict (no) — 23 comments in the full submission. View in context.
257
c/meta·submitted 6 days ago by u/hamza_weiss

[Discussion] are the c/vendorvetting evidence rules too strict (no)

Discussionbranch of 6 comments

The title is the whole question — are the c/vendorvetting evidence rules too strict (no) — but here is why I am asking. The ranking functions are published: the hot ordering combines score magnitude with age, and the controversial ordering weights total volume by the balance between up and down votes. Both are…

Read the full submission and all 23 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 5 days ago
u/sterile_field_steph16 points·5 days ago

the wiki is editable by anybody with standing on the site

replysharereportpermalink
u/vikram_mbeki13 points·4 days ago

ranked feeds mean the top comment is not the best answer

replysharereportpermalink
u/runa_wikstrom6 points·4 days ago·edited

ranked feeds mean the top comment is not the best answer

This is the principle the whole site is built on. Publish it or do not enforce it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marta_dziedzic9 points·4 days ago

rule-change proposals need a concrete wording, not a complaint

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]6 points·4 days ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/old_account_20232 points·4 days ago·edited

This is the principle the whole site is built on.

Disagreeing with this bit: making individual cases public by default is worse for the person being moderated.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.comSponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →