GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] the rules advice in here is 2 years out of date — 33 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2k
c/meta·submitted 2 years ago by u/hamza_weiss

[Discussion] the rules advice in here is 2 years out of date

Discussionbranch of 7 comments

Posting this as a discussion rather than a claim: the rules advice in here is 2 years out of date. To save the first four comments: 2 years. How a rule actually changes here, since people assume it is arbitrary. Somebody posts a proposal with replacement wording — not a complaint, actual text. It gets argued about,…

Read the full submission and all 33 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 2 years ago
u/mod_ambulatoryadmin90 points·2 years ago

Careful — that would make individual moderation cases public by default, which is worse for the person complaining.

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyc/scamalerts-12 points·2 years ago

Proposed a rule change here with actual wording and it was adopted. That is the process working and it is not fast.

replysharereportpermalink
u/cloudy_vial_carol-14 points·2 years ago

Edited a wiki page for the first time and nothing bad happened, which is apparently the point.

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_petrescu-17 points·2 years ago

ranked feeds mean the top comment is not the best answer

replysharereportpermalink
u/tomas_lundgren1 point·2 years ago

Complained about a rule without proposing anything and was politely pointed at this page. Fair.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hamza_weiss1 point·2 years ago

Complained about a rule without proposing anything and was politely pointed at this page.

Adding the practical note — the formula is published and you can reproduce the ordering yourself.

replysharereportpermalink
u/saskia_mwangi1 point·2 years ago

a rule you cannot inspect is just a preference

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →