GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of three years of wiki threads, summarised so you do not have to read them — 18 comments in the full submission. View in context.
163
c/meta·submitted 1 year ago by u/hamza_weiss

three years of wiki threads, summarised so you do not have to read them

Discussionbranch of 7 comments

three years of wiki threads, summarised so you do not have to read them. I have gone back and forth on this for months. Vendor source pages carry an outbound link to the supplier’s own storefront, marked nofollow and sponsored, disclosed on the page and again on the funding page. Nothing is received for it. The…

Read the full submission and all 18 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 1 year ago
u/draw_up_dizzy15 points·1 year ago

vendor source pages link storefronts and the link is marked

replysharereportpermalink
u/hamza_weissOP7 points·1 year ago

Argued against the strict evidence rule for a year. Then read a supplier thread on another site and stopped arguing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/saskia_mwangi5 points·1 year ago

What would the new rule do to the vendor evidence standard?

replysharereportpermalink
u/sterile_field_steph2 points·1 year ago

modmail first, always, and the thread second

replysharereportpermalink
u/hamza_weissOP11 points·1 year ago

no referral links, no affiliate links, not once

replysharereportpermalink
u/hub_opssite staff3 points·1 year ago

Have you taken this to modmail first?

replysharereportpermalink
u/hamza_weissOP2 points·1 year ago·edited

Checked the sponsor disclosure because I assumed it would be vague. It was extremely specific and slightly boring.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →