GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
848
c/maintenancephase·posted 23 days ago by u/piotr_grimaldi

[Results] two years, weight stable within 3kg, dose at a quarter of peak

Results Long Haul ×6

Reporting in. two years, weight stable within 3kg, dose at a quarter of peak.

The numbers the title promised, since a headline without them is worthless: 3kg. Everything below is context for those.

Stretched from seven to ten days and then to twelve over about four months. Appetite told me where the limit was before the scale did.

Chased the last three kilos with a dose increase and got a fortnight of nausea and no change in the number.

If somebody has the same thing measured a different way, post it next to mine and we will see whether they agree.

1,007 up / 159 down86% upvoted55 commentsid 1sfzfz7 Jul 2026

55 comments

26 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/mass_spec_maggieMS91 points·22 days ago

The two levers, described properly, because this board mixes them up constantly.

Reducing the dose lowers average exposure while keeping the weekly rhythm. Stretching the interval keeps the dose but lowers the trough between injections, which — with a week-long half-life — is why people notice appetite returning towards the end of a stretched cycle before they see anything on the scale.

The reported pattern here is stretching in small steps, a week to ten days to twelve, with appetite as the signal rather than the scale. Some people find dose reduction more comfortable. Neither is a schedule anybody here can hand you, and the fact that this phase has the least published guidance is exactly why board consensus deserves less weight than usual.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nabila_espinoza62 points·22 days ago

Not convinced. Interval stretching changes your exposure profile, not just the total, and the two are not equivalent.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_osei80 points·22 days ago

Careful — a dose reduction plan is a conversation with someone who knows your history, not a board consensus.

replysharereportpermalink
u/viktor_erdogan20 points·22 days ago

stretching the interval is not the same as reducing the dose

replysharereportpermalink
u/line_bergstrom16 points·22 days ago

the trials that looked at withdrawal are unambiguous about what follows

replysharereportpermalink
u/piotr_grimaldiOP0 points·22 days ago

Correction: that trial measured regain after withdrawal, not failure of the drug during treatment. Very different claim.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kasper_cabrera53 points·21 days ago

Withdrawal studies in this class consistently show substantial regain after discontinuation. That is a pharmacological finding about a chronic condition, not a statement about anyone’s discipline.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nikhil_lindqvist40 points·21 days ago·edited

I would not treat a two-kilo range as drift requiring action. That is ordinary weight variation.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hugo_norgaard20 points·20 days ago

I would not treat a two-kilo range as drift requiring action.

Disagreeing with this bit: a two-kilo range is not drift and treating it as a problem creates one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/piotr_grimaldiOP10 points·20 days ago

That is a range, not a trend. Two weigh-ins 5 days apart cannot distinguish them.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bastian_aalto12 points·20 days ago

appetite returns before the scale acknowledges anything

replysharereportpermalink
u/nadia_trevino2 points·20 days ago

Wrote down what maintenance would look like at about week 30, before I needed it. Having decided in advance made the transition boring.

replysharereportpermalink
u/crosspost_bot_no5 points·20 days ago

Has appetite changed, or only the scale?

replysharereportpermalink
u/nadia_trevino7 points·20 days ago·edited

Has appetite changed, or only the scale?

Adding one thing — decide what maintenance looks like before you arrive at it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/salma_almeida5 points·20 days ago

Adding one thing — decide what maintenance looks like before you arrive at it.

This reframing is the most useful thing on the board for anyone approaching this phase.

replysharereportpermalink
u/brigade_detector27 points·22 days ago

That reads like a taper schedule and this board cannot hand those out.

replysharereportpermalink
u/osman_ferrari-5 points·21 days ago

Push back: that is not a plateau, that is maintenance. You have arrived and you are describing it as a failure.

replysharereportpermalink
u/piotr_grimaldiOP1 point·21 days ago

What does your weigh-in frequency look like at this point?

replysharereportpermalink
u/ewan_marchand19 points·22 days ago

Maintenance is the phase with the least published guidance and the most individual variation, which is precisely why board consensus here is worth less than usual.

replysharereportpermalink
u/draw_up_dizzy6 points·22 days ago

plan the maintenance phase before you need it

replysharereportpermalink
u/ferritin_low4 points·22 days ago

Small fix — you have described interval stretching and called it a dose reduction. The exposure profiles differ.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kaplan_meier_kim2 points·21 days ago

regain after stopping is the expected outcome, not a personal failure

replysharereportpermalink
u/usp_appendixcompendial1 point·21 days ago·edited

a few kilos of drift is not a relapse

replysharereportpermalink
u/ms_fragmenter1 point·21 days ago

find the dose that holds, then stop optimising

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox_notes0 points·21 days ago

regain after stopping is the expected outcome, not a personal failure

kaplan_meier_kim is right that stretching and reducing are different levers. Worth separating in every one of these threads.

replysharereportpermalink
u/maintenance_mode_maxMOD13 points·21 days ago

Retitled — this is maintenance, not a plateau, and the original framing was doing damage.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/maintenancephase

The part nobody posts about: what happens at goal weight. Finding a lowest effective dose, dose-interval stretching, regain risk data, muscle retention, the psychology of not having a number to chase, and staying on indefinitely versus tapering.

39kmembers
95submissions
Dec 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/maintenancephase rules
  1. State how long you have been at maintenance. "Maintenance" at week 30 is not maintenance.
  2. Regain is not a moral failing and posts implying it is get removed.
  3. Dose-stretching experiences welcome; dose-stretching instructions are not.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.