[Discussion] we are measuring batch at the wrong time and calling it noise
we are measuring batch at the wrong time and calling it noise — a position I have arrived at slowly and would like tested. On inter-lab disagreement, which generates more heat here than anything else. Two services running different gradients, integrating differently, at possibly different wavelengths, will not…
Chain of custody is why member-funded testing is worth more than a supplied certificate: the vial tested is the vial that arrived at a member’s door.
Date of analysis anchors the result to a manufacturing period. A two-year-old result is evidence about two years ago and should be read that way.
BCH came back 98.3% on a claimed 98.0%, which is agreement not a discrepancy
if you are going to test, test the thing you actually received
Agreed — the template exists because a result without the batch and the claim is unanchored.
Fourth lot from the same supplier in the log now and the band has been tight the whole way. That consistency is the actual finding.