GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Janoshik] FGP cagrilintide — first independent number i have seen for it — 49 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.5k
c/labresults·submitted 1 months ago by u/piotr_nascimento

[Janoshik] FGP cagrilintide — first independent number i have seen for it

Janoshikbranch of 8 comments

Title says it — FGP cagrilintide — first independent number i have seen for it — so here is the boring supporting detail that makes it worth anything. GL Biochem BPC, batch matched the paperwork, Janoshik came back 97.6% against a claimed 97.0%. Paid for it myself, posting it because the log is only worth anything if…

Read the full submission and all 49 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 1 months ago
u/anders_vermeulen82 points·1 months ago

Kept every report as a PDF with the batch in the filename. Two years in, it is the most useful folder I own.

replysharereportpermalink
u/valeria_girard116 points·1 months ago

How many separate lots does your series cover?

replysharereportpermalink
u/yara_mensah66 points·1 months ago

date of analysis matters as much as the number

replysharereportpermalink
u/mei_cardoso55 points·1 months ago

Small fix — same supplier, different lot. The two rows in the log are not the same batch.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nayeli_iyer20 points·1 months ago

Fourth lot from the same supplier in the log now and the band has been tight the whole way. That consistency is the actual finding.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nadia_trevino12 points·1 months ago

vendor, compound, batch, service, result — that is the template

replysharereportpermalink
u/yannick_barros44 points·1 months ago

I would not post that as a finding. It is a single result and the template asks you to say so.

replysharereportpermalink
u/liv_nkemelu34 points·1 months ago

SGN came back 98.0% on a claimed 97.5%, which is agreement not a discrepancy

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.