[Lab] split one vial across VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter — 99.1% and 96.8%
The claim in the title is exactly the claim I am making: split one vial across VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter — 99.1% and 96.8%. Nothing implied beyond it. Numbers, in the order they matter: 99.1% and 96.8%. What a result posted here is actually worth, and how to make yours worth more. A single figure with no…
Area percent or net peptide content?
Did the vial lot match the paperwork lot?
Fourth lot from the same supplier in the log now and the band has been tight the whole way. That consistency is the actual finding.
Correction: that is the claimed figure, and the measured one is the higher of the two in your own screenshot.
Correction: that is the claimed figure, and the measured one is the higher of the two in your own screenshot.
Disagreeing with this line: that gap is ordinary variance, not a contradiction between the lab and the certificate.
That service reports area percent by default. Worth stating, since the thread has been comparing it to a mass figure.
Small fix — same supplier, different lot. The two rows in the log are not the same batch.