GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Janoshik] JEEP reta 10mg — 98.9%, and yes i paid for it myself — 15 comments in the full submission. View in context.
107
c/labresults·submitted 17 days ago by u/refund_ledger

[Janoshik] JEEP reta 10mg — 98.9%, and yes i paid for it myself

Janoshikbranch of 6 comments

JEEP reta 10mg — 98.9%, and yes i paid for it myself. That is the headline. The document, the batch and the service are below so you can argue with the method rather than with me. Numbers, in the order they matter: 10mg and 98.9%. Inter-lab variance on this assay runs roughly a point either way, driven mostly by…

Read the full submission and all 15 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 17 days ago
u/bpc_scepticresearch peptides18 points·17 days ago

Date of analysis anchors the result to a manufacturing period. A two-year-old result is evidence about two years ago and should be read that way.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tomas_lundgren4 points·17 days ago

I would not post that as a finding. It is a single result and the template asks you to say so.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_kimani3 points·17 days ago

inter-lab variance runs a point or two, plan your outrage accordingly

replysharereportpermalink
u/jonas_cardoso1 point·17 days ago

Cosigning on saying who paid. It is the whole basis on which this log is worth anything.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nayeli_iyer6 points·17 days ago

FGP came back 99.4% on a claimed 98.5%, which is agreement not a discrepancy

replysharereportpermalink
u/asks_dumb_questions2 points·17 days ago

Chain of custody is why member-funded testing is worth more than a supplied certificate: the vial tested is the vial that arrived at a member’s door.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.