GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Question] Janoshik — what am I missing here — 36 comments in the full submission. View in context.
3.4k
c/labresults·submitted 1 year ago by u/teodor_jansen

[Question] Janoshik — what am I missing here

Discussionbranch of 8 comments

Slightly embarrassed to be asking this, but: Janoshik — what am I missing here. A series across separate lots estimates a process. Repeat tests on one lot estimate the measurement. Both are useful and they answer different questions. Date of analysis anchors the result to a manufacturing period. A two-year-old result…

Read the full submission and all 36 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 1 year ago
u/tomas_lundgren429 points·1 year ago

I would not post that as a finding. It is a single result and the template asks you to say so.

replysharereportpermalink
u/medutest_melMOD222 points·1 year ago

Left up and added to the vendor source page log. Thanks for paying for it and posting it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kavya_radich264 points·1 year ago

This. The trend across separate lots is the number that tells you about a process rather than a vial.

replysharereportpermalink
u/wholesome_lurker71 points·1 year ago

Is that the same lot as the one in the thread from last month?

replysharereportpermalink
u/insulin_syringe_ian107 points·1 year ago

Same. The SSA results have been sitting in a tight band across lots, which is the useful shape.

replysharereportpermalink
u/teodor_jansenOP63 points·1 year ago

Same.

Agreed — and two services on one batch is the strongest thing any of us can produce individually.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]74 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/throwaway_44b152 points·1 year ago

Yes. Two services on the same batch is the strongest thing an individual member can produce, and it is not expensive.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.