GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] four vendors, same compound, same week, one test each — 39 comments in the full submission. View in context.
806
c/labresults·submitted 1 months ago by u/priya_ogunleye

[Lab] four vendors, same compound, same week, one test each

Labbranch of 6 comments

Right: four vendors, same compound, same week, one test each. I paid for this one myself, nobody sent me anything, and the receipts are in the comments. QSC BPC, batch matched the paperwork, PeptideMeter came back 98.6% against a claimed 98.0%. Paid for it myself, posting it because the log is only worth anything if…

Read the full submission and all 39 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 months ago
u/crp_curious41 points·1 months ago

Right, and a point or two between services is ordinary. It is agreement, and every month somebody posts it as a scandal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/noor_cardoso32 points·1 months ago

Correction: that is the claimed figure, and the measured one is the higher of the two in your own screenshot.

replysharereportpermalink
u/priya_ogunleyeOP17 points·1 months ago·edited

How many separate lots does your series cover?

replysharereportpermalink
u/slow_logbook_ftw6 points·1 months ago

FGP came back 98.6% on a claimed 98.0%, which is agreement not a discrepancy

replysharereportpermalink
u/bianca_demir-12 points·1 months ago·edited

a result with no batch number is about a vial nobody can identify

replysharereportpermalink
u/jonas_cardoso17 points·1 months ago

I would not post that as a finding. It is a single result and the template asks you to say so.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/labresults
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/janoshik_junkieu/medutest_melu/peptidemeter_patu/coa_janitor
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →