GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] 14th independent test on GGPeps — 98.3% on a claimed 97.5%, and the trend is the interesting part — 42 comments in the full submission. View in context.
9.5k
c/labresults·submitted 2 years ago by u/medutest_mel

[Lab] 14th independent test on GGPeps — 98.3% on a claimed 97.5%, and the trend is the interesting part

Labbranch of 9 comments

Numbers in the title, numbers in the post. 14th independent test on GGPeps — 98.3% on a claimed 97.5%, and the trend is the interesting part. To save the first four comments: 98.3% and 97.5%. Fourth lot from the same supplier in the log now and the band has been tight the whole way. That consistency is the actual…

Read the full submission and all 42 comments →

This branch

9 comments, started 2 years ago
u/noor_vermeulen328 points·2 years ago

Agreed — the template exists because a result without the batch and the claim is unanchored.

replysharereportpermalink
u/medutest_melOP122 points·2 years ago

First result I ever posted here got asked for the batch number and the claim. Fair, and my posts have been better ever since.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bpc_scepticresearch peptides76 points·2 years ago

What was the claim on the certificate you are comparing against?

replysharereportpermalink
u/saskia_mwangi27 points·2 years ago

inter-lab variance runs a point or two, plan your outrage accordingly

replysharereportpermalink
u/teodor_jansen9 points·2 years ago

net peptide content if the report gives it, and say which you are quoting

replysharereportpermalink
u/fatima_wojcik472 points·2 years ago

If the report gives a mass spectrum as well as UV purity, say so. Identity and relative quantity are separate claims and the log tracks both.

replysharereportpermalink
u/medutest_melOP369 points·2 years ago

a result with no batch number is about a vial nobody can identify

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_vermeulen194 points·2 years ago

Yes — date of analysis, because a result from two years ago describes a different manufacturing month.

replysharereportpermalink
u/reship_roulette221 points·2 years ago·edited

a result with no batch number is about a vial nobody can identify

This is why the template has a batch field. Without it the result is about a vial nobody can identify.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.