GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] 14th independent test on GGPeps — 98.3% on a claimed 97.5%, and the trend is the interesting part — 42 comments in the full submission. View in context.
9.5k
c/labresults·submitted 2 years ago by u/medutest_mel

[Lab] 14th independent test on GGPeps — 98.3% on a claimed 97.5%, and the trend is the interesting part

Labbranch of 8 comments

Numbers in the title, numbers in the post. 14th independent test on GGPeps — 98.3% on a claimed 97.5%, and the trend is the interesting part. To save the first four comments: 98.3% and 97.5%. Fourth lot from the same supplier in the log now and the band has been tight the whole way. That consistency is the actual…

Read the full submission and all 42 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 2 years ago
u/britta_boateng1.2k points·2 years ago

Chain of custody is why member-funded testing is worth more than a supplied certificate: the vial tested is the vial that arrived at a member’s door.

replysharereportpermalink
u/fatima_wojcik844 points·2 years ago

Do you have the trace, or only the summary?

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]521 points·2 years ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/georgi_chowdhury173 points·2 years ago

split a vial across two services once and you will never argue about ground truth again

replysharereportpermalink
u/janoshik_junkieindependent tester336 points·2 years ago

Right, and a point or two between services is ordinary. It is agreement, and every month somebody posts it as a scandal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/meera_oyelaran233 points·2 years ago

TFC BPC, batch matched the paperwork, Janoshik came back 99.5% against a claimed 99.0%. Paid for it myself, posting it because the log is only worth anything if people do.

replysharereportpermalink
u/mei_cardoso52 points·2 years ago

FGP came back 98.9% on a claimed 98.0%, which is agreement not a discrepancy

replysharereportpermalink
u/yannick_barros306 points·2 years ago

one result is a data point, agreement between two services is evidence

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.