GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of reading below spec threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly — 37 comments in the full submission. View in context.
3.6k
c/labresults·submitted 1 year ago by u/aurel_mwangi

reading below spec threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly

Janoshikbranch of 6 comments

reading below spec threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly. Not a hot take, just something I have not seen said plainly here. CPC BPC, batch matched the paperwork, PeptideMeter came back 98.7% against a claimed 98.0%. Paid for it myself, posting it because the log is only worth anything if people do. The template…

Read the full submission and all 37 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 year ago
u/refund_ledger172 points·1 year ago

Area percent and net peptide content are different measurements and most reports give one. Quote which, or the comparison downstream is meaningless.

replysharereportpermalink
u/janoshik_junkieindependent tester0 points·1 year ago

Area percent and net peptide content are different measurements and most reports give one.

Agreed — and two services on one batch is the strongest thing any of us can produce individually.

replysharereportpermalink
u/aurel_mwangiOP1 point·1 year ago

What was the claim on the certificate you are comparing against?

replysharereportpermalink
u/milan_villalobos1 point·1 year ago

Which service, and did you pay for it yourself?

replysharereportpermalink
u/aurel_mwangiOP0 points·1 year ago

Batch number and date of analysis?

replysharereportpermalink
u/reship_roulette1 point·1 year ago

post the claim next to the result or the number floats

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/labresults
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/janoshik_junkieu/medutest_melu/peptidemeter_patu/coa_janitor
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →