GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of anyone else notice resistance training kicking in around week 92 — 29 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.3k
c/glp1muscle·submitted 8 months ago by u/freya_onwuka

anyone else notice resistance training kicking in around week 92

Discussionbranch of 10 comments

Six-word version is the title — anyone else notice resistance training kicking in around week 92 — and the rest is context. DEXA has a meaningful coefficient of variation, and it differs between machines and protocols. Comparing scans from different clinics adds a systematic offset that is invisible on the report.…

Read the full submission and all 29 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 8 months ago
u/throwaway_wl202655 points·8 months ago

Three scans over eighteen months, same machine, same conditions. Only the third one made the first two interpretable.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]39 points·8 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_wojcik57 points·8 months ago

strength retention is a decent proxy and it is free

replysharereportpermalink
u/viktor_girard82 points·8 months ago

nothing on this board is a training or nutrition prescription

replysharereportpermalink
u/hassan_chowdhury20 points·8 months ago·edited

the appetite effect makes eating enough protein a logistics problem

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_stanescu7 points·8 months ago

Right — strength retention is a free proxy and it tracks better than most people expect.

replysharereportpermalink
u/liv_dumitru47 points·8 months ago

FFMI is a ratio and it moves when either term moves

replysharereportpermalink
u/protein_first_pMOD21 points·8 months ago

Reminder that nobody here is prescribing training and the sidebar says so.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tuva_kirchner16 points·8 months ago

losing weight slower does not automatically preserve more lean mass

replysharereportpermalink
u/edit_for_clarity8 points·8 months ago

Yes. Lean mass change during weight loss is expected; the useful question is the proportion, not whether it happens.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/glp1muscle

Lean-mass retention during rapid weight loss: protein targets, resistance-training minimums, DEXA and BIA measurement reality, FFMI tracking, and the sarcopenia question that nobody funded a proper trial for.

30kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/glp1muscle rules
  1. Body-composition claims need a method. Bathroom BIA scales are not a method.
  2. Protein targets in g/kg, not "lots".
  3. No supplement selling, no coaching solicitation.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.