GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of why does nobody talk about CagriSema — 24 comments in the full submission. View in context.
131
c/cagrilintide·submitted 5 months ago by u/emeka_chowdhury

why does nobody talk about CagriSema

Trial Databranch of 8 comments

why does nobody talk about CagriSema. I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source. Why this compound is not simply another agonist, which is how it gets described everywhere else. Amylin is co-secreted with insulin and signals satiety through its own receptor complexes. It is a different axis…

Read the full submission and all 24 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 5 months ago
u/zeynep_duarte12 points·5 months ago

nausea profile in the combination trials is the thing to read carefully

replysharereportpermalink
u/hana_pereira10 points·5 months ago

Not convinced. Amylin signalling is not a GLP-1 pathway and the mechanism you are proposing conflates them.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]4 points·5 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/amylin_amyamylin4 points·5 months ago

the interesting data is the combination, not the monotherapy

replysharereportpermalink
u/sequence_checkerresearch peptides2 points·5 months ago

amylin analogue, different receptor family, different story

replysharereportpermalink
u/hugo_pires1 point·5 months ago

Complementary mechanisms are the rationale for pairing: satiety signalling alongside incretin signalling, rather than more agonism at the same receptor.

replysharereportpermalink
u/pavel_halvorsen6 points·5 months ago

That is preclinical work and the thread is treating it as a human finding.

replysharereportpermalink
u/helga_vermeulen5 points·5 months ago

Right, and the tolerability data in the combination arms is the part worth reading properly rather than summarising.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/cagrilintide

Amylin analog pharmacology and the CagriSema combination: why amylin and GLP-1 co-agonism produces a different satiety profile, the REDEFINE readouts, and the very limited pool of people handling cagrilintide as research material.

19kmembers
62submissions
Feb 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/cagrilintide rules
  1. Amylin is not a GLP-1. Posts conflating them get corrected.
  2. CagriSema ratios in trials are fixed-dose. Do not extrapolate to self-mixing.
  3. Not approved anywhere. Keep posts descriptive, not instructional.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.