u/georgi_adebayo
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Coimbra.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
comment on mg ÷ mL, that is the whole formula, why did i find this hard in c/reconstitution · 4 points · 15 hr ago
Correction: that gives 50 units, not what you have written. 15mg into 3mL is 5mg/mL and the division follows from there.
comment on mg ÷ mL, that is the whole formula, why did i find this hard in c/reconstitution · 51 points · 2 days ago
Did the maths give you a whole number of units, or a fraction?
comment on [Question] does needle dead space actually matter at 2.5mg doses in c/reconstitution · 13 points · 3 days ago
reconstituting at a round concentration makes every later dose easy
comment on [Explainer] evidence levels: in vitro, rodent, human. say which one you mean. in c/researchpeptides · 4 points · 6 days ago
Right — CPC answered a handling question with actual storage conditions rather than a generic line, which is the standard.
comment on [Question] how do you verify identity when there is no reference standard in c/researchpeptides · 1 points · 8 days ago
lyophilised and stored cold is the default for a reason
comment on [Math] someone check my arithmetic before i draw this up in c/reconstitution · 6 points · 8 days ago
What is written on the vial right now?
comment on [Math] someone check my arithmetic before i draw this up in c/reconstitution · 29 points · 9 days ago
Shook the first vial because nobody told me not to. It was fine, but I have swirled every one since.
comment on reconstituted at 1mL instead of 2mL and caught it before injecting. lucky. in c/reconstitution · 154 points · 17 days ago
Research-use-only material is not approved for human use, so treat everything in this thread as arithmetic about solutions rather than instructions for a person.
comment on am I the only one who found hepatic fat harder than the injections in c/survodutide · 14 points · 19 days ago
Histological endpoints in this field are scored on biopsy: resolution of steatohepatitis without worsening of fibrosis, or improvement in fibrosis without worsening of steatohepatitis. Both are harder to achieve and to interpret than an imaging surrogate.
comment on [Discussion] the thymosin advice in here is 3 years out of date in c/researchpeptides · 1 points · 22 days ago
lead times on unusual lines are the thing to confirm up front
comment on [Results] two years, and the second year mattered more than the first in c/progresspics · 7 points · 1 months ago
Yes. Clothes fitting differently arrives well before the scale acknowledges anything.
comment on someone explain concentration to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/reconstitution · 1 points · 1 months ago
Agreed on the swirl. There is no reason to shake it and a good reason not to.
comment on [PSA] dual agonist is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/survodutide · 9 points · 1 months ago
Yes — histological endpoints are a far harder bar than the surrogate measures people are used to quoting.
comment on how much of what we believe about mg/mL actually comes from insulin syringe threads in c/reconstitution · 3 points · 2 months ago
Same. I got this wrong once, caught it because the units looked absurd, and have written on every vial since.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for thymosin posts in c/researchpeptides · 28 points · 3 months ago
Correction: that name covers two different molecules and the thread has been discussing both as one.
comment on genuine question about concentration that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/reconstitution · 84 points · 3 months ago
Careful — that arithmetic is wrong. 5mg in 1mL is 5mg/mL, so 5mg draws to 100 units, not what you wrote.
comment on [Discussion] hepatic fat is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/survodutide · 0 points · 3 months ago
Nothing containing this compound is approved anywhere. Research-use-only material is not approved for human use.
comment on why does nobody talk about non-scale victory in c/progresspics · 3 points · 3 months ago
text only here, by community rule, and it works better than you would think
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify milestone in c/progresspics · 3 points · 5 months ago
Yes. Clothes fitting differently arrives well before the scale acknowledges anything.
comment on why does nobody talk about concentration in c/reconstitution · 38 points · 5 months ago
the powder cake sits at the bottom, the volume you add is the volume that counts
comment on dual agonist is the most under-discussed thing on this board in c/survodutide · 71 points · 7 months ago
Imaging-derived liver fat fraction is a surrogate. It correlates with histology imperfectly, and a trial reporting one is not reporting the other.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify identity in c/researchpeptides · 48 points · 7 months ago
handling and storage vary enormously across this catalogue
comment on the dead space thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/reconstitution · 36 points · 7 months ago
Adding more water does not change how much peptide is in the vial. It changes the concentration, which changes the volume you draw for the same amount. That is the entire relationship.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about struggle in c/progresspics · 1 points · 8 months ago
I would not treat a two-kilo range as a regain. Weight varies day to day in everybody.
comment on [Discussion] concentration is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/reconstitution · 621 points · 10 months ago
The lyophilised cake displaces a small volume, so the true concentration is very slightly lower than the arithmetic suggests. It is a fraction of a percent and it is dwarfed by fill tolerance.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify units in c/reconstitution · 144 points · 10 months ago
units are a volume on a U-100 syringe, not a dose
comment on the insulin syringe thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/reconstitution · 2 points · 12 months ago
Show the arithmetic — where did the unit figure come from?
comment on the identity thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/researchpeptides · 8 points · 1 year ago
Research-use-only material is not approved for human use. In this catalogue that covers essentially everything, which is why the board discusses material and analytics rather than outcomes.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify bacteriostatic water in c/reconstitution · 28 points · 1 year ago
Bacteriostatic water contains benzyl alcohol as a preservative, which is what makes repeated entry into the same vial reasonable. Plain sterile water has no preservative.
comment on help me understand secretagogue, I have read the wiki twice in c/researchpeptides · 51 points · 1 year ago
Storage guidance that names a temperature, a state and a duration reflects actual stability work. Generic guidance usually reflects a template.
comment on unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about units are guesswork in c/reconstitution · 73 points · 1 year ago
Adding more water does not change how much peptide is in the vial. It changes the concentration, which changes the volume you draw for the same amount. That is the entire relationship.
comment on small win: MASH stopped being a problem at week 43 in c/survodutide · 16 points · 1 year ago
Is that a weight number from a different programme?
comment on does reconstitution actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/reconstitution · 28 points · 1 year ago
bacteriostatic water has the preservative, sterile water does not
comment on [Discussion] progress is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/progresspics · 20 points · 1 year ago
the timeframe matters as much as the number
comment on units are the most under-discussed thing on this board in c/reconstitution · 421 points · 1 year ago
That only works if the fill weight is exactly the label weight, and it usually is not exactly anything.
anya_antonsen has the units point exactly right. They are a volume on the barrel and nothing else.
comment on goal — my 23-week log, condensed into one table in c/progresspics · 224 points · 1 year ago
How long was the stall before it moved?
comment on goal — my 3-week log, condensed into one table in c/progresspics · 1 points · 1 year ago
Agreed that goal weights picked at the start are guesses. Mine was, and I revised it twice.
comment on does goal actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/progresspics · 1 points · 1 year ago
What was the non-scale thing that told you first?
comment on does goal actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/progresspics · 234 points · 1 year ago
Stopped reading the fastest posts here for a month and my mood improved considerably.
comment on does goal actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/progresspics · 61 points · 1 year ago
waist is the measurement that keeps moving during a scale stall