u/draw_up_dizzy

protein and resistance training, that is the entire intervention

salt forms are the recurring argument and the answer is boring

Adding one thing — ask for the facility name. Most will give it, and the ones that will not have answered you.

Cosigning on discontinuation. It is a result about tolerability and it gets buried every time.

the appendix is where the interesting tables live

Body weight varies by a couple of kilos over days in stable people through fluid, glycogen and gut content.

Adding one thing — decide what maintenance looks like before you arrive at it.

Agreed that the top comment is not the best answer. The ranking optimises for early agreement.

This. The withdrawal data is not ambiguous and framing regain as a personal failure is both wrong and cruel.

Formulary criteria are revised, and plan renewal is a natural point at which a previously refused request may succeed without anything about the appli

This is why every thread here needs a province in it.

a denial letter names a criterion, that is your handle

Yes. The habits have to outlive the dose or the maintenance phase is just a countdown.

Cosigning on planning it in advance. Deciding what maintenance looks like while still losing is much easier than deciding it in a panic.

Paid noticeably more at one clinic than another for what turned out to be the same facility behind both.

Funding and links, in full, because the question deserves a straight answer.

dose_creep_dan is right that the strict evidence rule is the asset, not the friction.

This. The withdrawal data is not ambiguous and framing regain as a personal failure is both wrong and cruel.

the habits are the part that has to outlive the dose

Yes — a proposal with concrete wording gets discussed. A complaint about the rules in general does not.