[Results] 96 weeks, 40kg, and 2.4mg was the hard part
Six-word version is the title — 96 weeks, 40kg, and 2.4mg was the hard part — and the rest is context. The relevant figures are 96 weeks, 40kg and 2.4mg, and they come from the same log I have kept the whole time. Sat at 1.7mg for four months because it was doing the job. Everyone told me to go up. The one time I…
Standard reminder: no personal titration plans for other members, and no medical advice. Everything else is fine.
Did protein intake change in the same window?
Week 83: 20kg down, constipation basically gone since about week 4, and the honest headline is that nothing dramatic happened. It was boring and it worked.
What did week 40 look like compared with this one? The month either side is the useful comparison.
Week 83: 20kg down, constipation basically gone since about week 4, and the honest headline is that nothing dramatic happened.
vikram_ferreira is describing the standard shape here and it matches the trial data better than most anecdotes do.
Standard reminder: no personal titration plans for other members, and no medical advice.
Right, and the timescale is the bit that keeps getting lost. Judge a step at a month, not at a weekend.
the scale is the least sensitive instrument you own
the scale is the least sensitive instrument you own
This is the part I would underline for anyone skimming. Everything else in the thread is downstream of it.
sema is weekly for a reason, the half-life does the smoothing