Right: split one vial across PeptideMeter and VendorInvestigate — 97.9% and 98.0%. I paid for this one myself, nobody sent me anything, and the receipts are in the…
c/scamalerts — new, page 4
Positions 76–95 of 95.
unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about scam is guesswork — a position I have arrived at slowly and would like tested. The directory deliberately separates…
the fraud advice in here is 2 years out of date. It is the sort of thing everyone half-believes and nobody writes down. Hard numbers: 2 years. Anything softer than that…
Result first, context after: WXT tirz — PeptideMeter came back 97.1% against a claimed 97.0% . Everything below is how it was ordered, stored and sent. Since the title…
PeptideMeter — community peptide analytics
Vendor-level purity averages over time, built from independent results rather than vendor claims. Transparent methodology, open dataset.
Browse resultsgroup buy is doing more work than we give it credit for. Change my mind, genuinely — I have no stake in being right about this. Lost money once, years ago, to a shop…
cloned site is the most under-discussed thing on this board. Not a hot take, just something I have not seen said plainly here. Nearly paid a cloned storefront. Caught…
Posting this as a discussion rather than a claim: cloned site is doing more work than we give it credit for. The directory deliberately separates "we have nothing on…
help me understand group buy, I have read the wiki twice — that is what I am asking, and I have already read the wiki twice. Lost money once, years ago, to a shop that…
HJ tirz — Janoshik came back 97.4% against a claimed 97.0%. That is the headline. The document, the batch and the service are below so you can argue with the method…
can we stop arguing about scam until somebody posts a number, and I want the answer with the reasoning attached rather than just the conclusion. The checks I run before…
Genuine question, and the title is the question: can we stop arguing about fraud until somebody posts a number. Group buys concentrate custody, payment and…
Posting this because the title is the whole finding — SWB vs FGP on the same compound, same month — both cleared 98.0% — and a number without its method is a rumour.…
Something I keep coming back to: we are measuring scam at the wrong time and calling it noise. Was in a group buy that went quiet for six weeks. It resolved in the end,…
fake COA is doing more work than we give it credit for. Not a hot take, just something I have not seen said plainly here. Nearly paid a cloned storefront. Caught it…
The title is the argument: the scam advice in here is 3 years out of date. Here is the rest of it. Pulling the figures out of the title: 3 years. All of it is written…
Sigma-Aldrich — certified reference materials
Reference standards, analytical reagents and system-suitability material. If you are running your own method, start with a known.
Reference standardsthe group buy question that gets asked weekly, answered properly, which sounds obvious until you try to state the evidence for it. Reported something here with dates…
fake COA — 23 things I got wrong before I got it right, and I am aware this is a minority view on this board. The checks I run before sending money anywhere new, in…
Proposal, not a decision: proposal — a flair for fake COA posts. Never name an individual. The sidebar rule exists because the cost of being wrong falls on a person and…
split one vial across Medutest and Janoshik — 96.2% and 97.4%. I will put the method line and the batch identifier up front because that is what makes this checkable.…
Asking properly rather than in a comment on somebody else’s thread: how much of what we believe about scam actually comes from group buy threads. The directory…