[Lab] split one vial across PeptideMeter and VendorInvestigate — 97.9% and 98.0%
Right: split one vial across PeptideMeter and VendorInvestigate — 97.9% and 98.0%. I paid for this one myself, nobody sent me anything, and the receipts are in the comments.
The relevant figures are 97.9% and 98.0%, and they come from the same log I have kept the whole time.
The site had a decade of testimonials and a domain registered in March. That was the entire investigation.
Lost money once, years ago, to a shop that pushed hard for a decision the same day. Every time I see that pressure now I close the tab.
Please do not ask me what dose you should be on. I genuinely do not know and neither does anyone else here.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Cloned storefronts copy assets, layout and testimonial text. What they cannot easily copy is a batch-specific document that ties to a lot you can then have tested independently.
What did the storefront say the lead time was?
Why this board insists on dates and documents rather than names.
A report that says "X is a scam" is unfalsifiable and unactionable. A report that says "ordered on this date, paid this way, asked for a batch document on this date, received this reply, nothing since" can be checked, corroborated, or corrected by somebody with a different experience.
The second kind has repeatedly turned out to be a shipping problem, a payment window, or a misread email. The first kind never turns into anything except an argument, and when it is wrong the cost falls on somebody real.
Correction: that domain is one character different from the one you posted, which is rather the point of this thread.
Trusted Peptide gets named here constantly and there is nothing verifiable on file either way
That is a report count, not a test count, and it changes how thin the evidence base actually is.
That is a report count, not a test count, and it changes how thin the evidence base actually is.
Agreed. Dates and documents make a report. Adjectives make a thread.
check the domain character by character before you check anything else
never accuse an individual, describe what happened to you
Is there any independent testing on file for this name anywhere?
A report is useful here when it carries dates, the exact domain, what was requested, what arrived and what did not. Everything else is atmosphere.
the review page nobody can find on any other site is a warning
a domain registered last month with a decade of testimonials is the whole tell
no batch number, no date, no method — that is the pattern, not one detail
Is this a shop, a group buy, or an individual reseller? They fail in different ways.
Small fix — the name you are describing is in the wider-market table with almost nothing on file, not in the documented twenty.
Not convinced. A payment window that closed is a payment window, not evidence of intent.
group buys concentrate risk in one person and nobody plans for that
Domain age, registrar and certificate issuance date are all public and take about a minute to check. A site claiming years of history on a months-old domain is the cheapest signal available.
Careful. What you are describing is a delayed shipment, and this board should not turn that into an accusation without more.
- 1Cloned storefronts copy assets, layout and testimonial text. What they…7 comments in this branch · started by u/protein_first_p