[Meta] proposal — a flair for thymosin posts
proposal — a flair for thymosin posts. Disagreement welcome, but bring a concrete alternative wording. The three questions to ask before ordering anything from the long tail of a catalogue. What exactly is it — catalogue number or sequence, not a common name, because several common names map to more than one…
Research-use-only material is not approved for human use. In this catalogue that covers essentially everything, which is why the board discusses material and analytics rather than outcomes.
Small fix — that is net peptide content, not purity. Both are on the certificate and they differ substantially here.
identity before purity, every time, for anything unusual
a secretagogue and a fragment are not the same class of thing
if nobody has tested it here, that is a fact about us, not the compound
catalogue depth is not the same as catalogue quality
What reference standard was the assay run against?
Bought small on anything without a testing history here. That rule has never once cost me anything.
Naming in this space is inconsistent. Several widely used names map to more than one molecule, so a catalogue number and a sequence beat a common name every time.
handling and storage vary enormously across this catalogue
the sequence is the product, everything else is packaging
Research-use-only material is not approved for human use.
This is the rule for anything unusual. Identity before anything else.