GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] can we stop arguing about ATTAIN until somebody posts a number — 49 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.8k
c/orforglipron·submitted 2 years ago by u/zeynep_ndiaye

[Discussion] can we stop arguing about ATTAIN until somebody posts a number

Discussionbranch of 8 comments

can we stop arguing about ATTAIN until somebody posts a number. Searched first, found three threads that contradict each other, hence the post. Assumed the peptide purity conversations transferred and they do not. Different analytical problem entirely. Milligram comparisons across molecule classes are meaningless.…

Read the full submission and all 49 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 2 years ago
u/nils_ferreira53 points·2 years ago

Daily dosing gives a very different exposure profile from a weekly injectable: peaks and troughs within each day rather than a smoothed weekly curve.

replysharereportpermalink
u/erez_yilmaz14 points·2 years ago·edited

Is that from the publication or the press release?

replysharereportpermalink
u/salma_almeida-2 points·2 years ago

Yes — nothing containing this is approved anywhere, and the threads keep forgetting it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/neha_rahimi1 point·2 years ago

Push back: daily dosing is not automatically better adherence. It is a different failure mode, not a solved problem.

replysharereportpermalink
u/soren_yildiz1 point·2 years ago

the manufacturing story is genuinely different from the injectables

replysharereportpermalink
u/tidy_vialdrawer_watch281 point·2 years ago

It is a non-peptide small-molecule agonist at the GLP-1 receptor. That is a substantial medicinal chemistry achievement: getting a small molecule to activate a receptor evolved for a peptide ligand.

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_ndiayeOP0 points·2 years ago

What analytical method was used — this is not the usual peptide assay question?

replysharereportpermalink
u/preservative_free_p1 point·2 years ago

That is a phase 2 result being quoted as though the programme had reported.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/orforglipron

The small-molecule oral: why a non-peptide agonist escapes the absorption problems of oral semaglutide, what the ATTAIN and ACHIEVE readouts showed, and what a pill with no refrigeration requirement would do to the entire supply conversation this site is built around.

21kmembers
62submissions
Feb 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/orforglipron rules
  1. Small molecule, not a peptide. Purity discussion here is a different problem.
  2. Cite ATTAIN/ACHIEVE arms specifically when quoting numbers.
  3. Availability speculation must be flaired Speculation.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.