is it bad that i am not nauseous at all
is it bad that i am not nauseous at all, and I want the answer with the reasoning attached rather than just the conclusion.
I confused two very similar words on my first order and asked here, expecting to be mocked. Three people explained it properly instead.
Nothing on this board is medical advice, and the people answering you — including me — are members with spreadsheets rather than clinicians.
Week 12 for me was completely flat and I was convinced something was wrong. It was not. Month two was where everything happened.
Happy to answer the boring questions. Those are usually the ones worth asking.
best — the order this archive was captured in
ask the dumb question, three other people are searching for it
That is area percent from a certificate, not the amount of peptide in the vial. Two different numbers and a very common mix-up.
Appetite change and weight change are different measurements on different timescales. The first is usually noticed first and the second lags it.
write the concentration on the vial, you will thank yourself
What is the actual question underneath the question? Happy to answer both.
Agreed — week two with nothing on the scale is so common it should be in the sidebar. It probably is.
The injection was scarier in my head than in reality. It took about ten seconds and I felt slightly silly afterwards.
Titration is a tolerance ladder. Each step exists so the gastrointestinal effects settle before the next increase, which is why the intervals are what they are.
Titration is a tolerance ladder.
Adding the one habit worth starting today: write the concentration on the vial.
Is this your first step up or the starting dose?
Wrote the concentration on the vial after reading it here. Have never once had to reconstruct it from memory since.
Wrote the concentration on the vial after reading it here.
This is the answer. Everything else in the thread is elaboration on it.
Yes — nobody here is your clinician, and the good answers on this board all end with that.
Research-use-only material is not approved for human use. That is a plain statement of regulatory fact and it belongs in every beginner thread.
That comparison is between two different products at two different concentrations, which is where the confusion is coming from.
That comparison is between two different products at two different concentrations, which is where the confusion is coming from.
Agreed, and for anyone finding this later: that is the normal experience, not a warning sign.
Asked what a COA was in my first week. Somebody linked the explainer and I have been reading them ever since.
week two with nothing happening is normal
What week are you in?
Careful — that is a dosing recommendation dressed as an anecdote, and this board removes those.
Not quite. Bacteriostatic and sterile water are different products and only one is intended for repeated entry.
- 1ask the dumb question, three other people are searching for it18 comments in this branch · started by u/second_week_sceptic