[Rules] proposal: auto-flair any vendor post with no batch number
proposal: auto-flair any vendor post with no batch number. Short post, long comment section, probably.
A rule-change proposal needs replacement wording because that is what can be evaluated. Without it there is nothing to compare against the current text.
Read the ranking formula out of scepticism and reproduced the ordering in a spreadsheet. It does what it says.
Had a post removed, went to modmail, got a specific explanation and disagreed with it politely. It stayed removed and I understood why.
If somebody has the same thing measured a different way, post it next to mine and we will see whether they agree.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The evidence standard on the vendor boards requires a document, a date or a named service behind any claim about a supplier. It is what makes those threads worth reading years later.
Proposed a rule change here with actual wording and it was adopted. That is the process working and it is not fast.
no referral links, no affiliate links, not once
Yes. Nobody here is paid and the disclosure page says so in tedious detail, which is the correct level of tedious.
Proposed a rule change here with actual wording and it was adopted.
Adding the practical note — the formula is published and you can reproduce the ordering yourself.
the archive-after-a-year policy is deliberate
Who does this help, and who does it cost?
vendor source pages link storefronts and the link is marked
- 1Proposed a rule change here with actual wording and it was adopted. That is…7 comments in this branch · started by u/sanne_novak