GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of meta — 21 things I got wrong before I got it right — 15 comments in the full submission. View in context.
82
c/meta·submitted 1 year ago by u/joaquin_wojcik

meta — 21 things I got wrong before I got it right

Rulesbranch of 7 comments

meta — 21 things I got wrong before I got it right, and I am aware this is a minority view on this board. How a rule actually changes here, since people assume it is arbitrary. Somebody posts a proposal with replacement wording — not a complaint, actual text. It gets argued about, usually for a week or two. If it…

Read the full submission and all 15 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 1 year ago
u/kenji_vasquez10 points·1 year ago

A rule-change proposal needs replacement wording because that is what can be evaluated. Without it there is nothing to compare against the current text.

replysharereportpermalink
u/injection_site_iris6 points·1 year ago

the archive-after-a-year policy is deliberate

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_wojcikOP3 points·1 year ago·edited

Small fix — archiving happens at a year, not at six months. It is in the published policy.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]1 point·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/ewan_marchand1 point·1 year ago

removals get explained publicly where the rule allows it

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_wojcik2 points·1 year ago

That is the controversial ordering, not the hot one. Different formula, different behaviour.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hub_opssite staff2 points·1 year ago

Correction: that rule applies to the vendor boards specifically, not site-wide. The wording is on the rules page.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →