GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of three years of rules threads, summarised so you do not have to read them — 45 comments in the full submission. View in context.
942
c/meta·submitted 5 months ago by u/hedda_aguirre

three years of rules threads, summarised so you do not have to read them

Announcementbranch of 6 comments

Something I keep coming back to: three years of rules threads, summarised so you do not have to read them. Checked the sponsor disclosure because I assumed it would be vague. It was extremely specific and slightly boring. Funding and links, in full, because the question deserves a straight answer. Sponsor units are…

Read the full submission and all 45 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 5 months ago
u/runa_grimaldi142 points·5 months ago

Vendor source pages carry an outbound link to the supplier’s own storefront, marked nofollow and sponsored, disclosed on the page and again on the funding page. Nothing is received for it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hedda_aguirreOP51 points·5 months ago

no referral links, no affiliate links, not once

replysharereportpermalink
u/bastian_moreau15 points·5 months ago

Push back: the ranking is not hiding anything. The formula is published and you can reproduce the ordering.

replysharereportpermalink
u/prior_auth_painappeals17 points·5 months ago

modmail first, always, and the thread second

replysharereportpermalink
u/vito_chowdhury11 points·5 months ago

this place sells nothing and takes nothing from any supplier

replysharereportpermalink
u/copay_card_cc13 points·5 months ago

What would the new rule do to the vendor evidence standard?

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →