GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of how much of what we believe about Medutest actually comes from batch threads — 48 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.1k
c/labresults·submitted 4 months ago by u/honest_syringe

how much of what we believe about Medutest actually comes from batch threads

Labbranch of 7 comments

Asking properly rather than in a comment on somebody else’s thread: how much of what we believe about Medutest actually comes from batch threads. Tested three lots over a year rather than three vials from one lot. Cost the same and told me something completely different. Sent a vial in specifically to check a…

Read the full submission and all 48 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 4 months ago
u/edit_for_clarity112 points·4 months ago

Push back: three tests on one lot is one lot. It tells you about that lot and almost nothing about the next one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kian_verhoeven93 points·4 months ago

Date of analysis anchors the result to a manufacturing period. A two-year-old result is evidence about two years ago and should be read that way.

replysharereportpermalink
u/honest_syringeOP55 points·4 months ago

Is that the same lot as the one in the thread from last month?

replysharereportpermalink
u/due_diligence_dee78 points·4 months ago

Area percent and net peptide content are different measurements and most reports give one. Quote which, or the comparison downstream is meaningless.

replysharereportpermalink
u/honest_syringeOP0 points·4 months ago

Correcting myself: I quoted net peptide content against somebody else’s area percent. Not a comparison.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]1 point·4 months ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/honest_syringeOP43 points·4 months ago

Kept every report as a PDF with the batch in the filename. Two years in, it is the most useful folder I own.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.