reading test results threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly
The title is the argument: reading test results threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly. Here is the rest of it. Have now spent more on testing than on some of the orders. No regrets — the log is the reason I can buy without agonising. First result I ever posted here got asked for the batch number and the claim.…
Date of analysis anchors the result to a manufacturing period. A two-year-old result is evidence about two years ago and should be read that way.
[deleted]
Push back: three tests on one lot is one lot. It tells you about that lot and almost nothing about the next one.
Area percent or net peptide content?
Yes. Two services on the same batch is the strongest thing an individual member can produce, and it is not expensive.
That service reports area percent by default. Worth stating, since the thread has been comparing it to a mass figure.
QST came back 99.2% on a claimed 98.5%, which is agreement not a discrepancy