Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] the test results advice in here is 2 years out of date — 22 comments in the full submission. View in context.
209
[Discussion] the test results advice in here is 2 years out of date
The title is the argument: the test results advice in here is 2 years out of date. Here is the rest of it. To save the first four comments: 2 years. Date of analysis anchors the result to a manufacturing period. A two-year-old result is evidence about two years ago and should be read that way. Chain of custody is why…
I would not post that as a finding. It is a single result and the template asks you to say so.
What was the claim on the certificate you are comparing against?
Cosigning on saying who paid. It is the whole basis on which this log is worth anything.
inter-lab variance runs a point or two, plan your outrage accordingly
date of analysis matters as much as the number
if you are going to test, test the thing you actually received